Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kei Watanabe's avatar

The number that stuck with me from the Cursor piece: same task, same passing test suite, $1,339 with Opus 4.8 planning and Composer 2.5 doing the work, against $10,565 with GPT-5.5 doing both roles. Nearly 8x, for the same result. Very few moments in a large task actually need the most expensive model, and most of us are still paying as though they all do.

The Sequoia keynote arrives at a similar place from the other direction. Capabilities move weekly, your customers do not. Wrapping yourself around the customer is the slower, duller, more durable bet.

And an easy one to answer: of the 8 places you can now export highlights to (Notion, Obsidian, Readwise, Zotero, Tana, Workflowy, Roam, Anki), which one do you actually live in? It genuinely decides where the next round of work goes.

No Substack account? We are also on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/glasp/

No posts

Ready for more?