Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kazuki Nakayashiki's avatar

One idea that really stood out to me was: your customers are changing much more slowly than the models.

It's easy to get caught up in every new model release, but lasting products are built by deeply understanding customer problems, not by chasing the latest capabilities. Models will keep improving and becoming more accessible. Customer trust and insight take much longer to earn.

My favorite takeaway was: "Build toward your customers, not toward the capabilities."

What resonated with you the most?

Kei Watanabe's avatar

The number that stuck with me from the Cursor piece: same task, same passing test suite, $1,339 with Opus 4.8 planning and Composer 2.5 doing the work, against $10,565 with GPT-5.5 doing both roles. Nearly 8x, for the same result. Very few moments in a large task actually need the most expensive model, and most of us are still paying as though they all do.

The Sequoia keynote arrives at a similar place from the other direction. Capabilities move weekly, your customers do not. Wrapping yourself around the customer is the slower, duller, more durable bet.

And an easy one to answer: of the 8 places you can now export highlights to (Notion, Obsidian, Readwise, Zotero, Tana, Workflowy, Roam, Anki), which one do you actually live in? It genuinely decides where the next round of work goes.

No Substack account? We are also on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/glasp/

No posts

Ready for more?